KROG data model

    Structured information for explicit legal reasoning.

    The KROG data model organises actors, facts, relationships, sources and evidence for legal analysis. AISV supplies defined concepts and relations for AI standardisation and related roles. KROG rule logic expresses the rules, conditions and exceptions applied to the modelled information.

    The aim is to make conclusions traceable to their inputs, applicable rules and supporting sources.

    What the model represents

    Actors and their roles, facts, relationships between them, the sources each fact rests on, the documentation and evidence that support it, and the links to the rules that apply. The model is not limited to standards; the example below is one bounded use.

    How AISV is used

    The AI Standardisation Vocabulary (AISV) defines concepts and relations for AI standardisation: deliverables, committees, stages, votes and roles under the AI Act. It is published by KROG RULES. AISV does not yet cover every concept used in the courses or in other legal fields; where it has no term, the model uses established metadata vocabularies or records the gap.

    How the model connects to KROG rule logic

    The model holds declared facts and their sources. KROG rule logic states the rules that are evaluated against them: who must, may or must not do what, under which conditions and exceptions. A conclusion is only a computed result when a run with documented inputs, rule identity, rule version and result trace exists. Explore the KROG framework.

    Illustrative example: EN 18286

    A simplified illustration. It is not a complete legal assessment, not evidence of compliance and not the output of an executed rule.

    Resource
    EN 18286:2026, a European Standard developed with the aim of citation, i.e. a Candidate Harmonised StandardSource: KROG Standards Explorer record
    Developed by
    developed by CEN-CENELEC JTC 21 WG2, within the technical committee JTC 21Source: KROG Standards Explorer record
    Intended support
    Intended to support Article 17 requirements (supports requirement)Source: KROG Standards Explorer record
    Events
    Ratified 12 July 2026 (DOR); available 22 July 2026 (DAV)Source: CEN project record
    Official Journal reference
    Not cited, as reported by the source; not independently checkedSource: Inclusiveness Newsletter, Edition 16 (8 September 2026)
    Annex ZA coverage
    Not checked. The Annex ZA of this edition is not modelled here, so no clause-level coverage is statedSource: —

    Rule to be evaluated · illustrative reasoning

    Publication by CEN-CENELEC does not itself confer a presumption of conformity. Any such presumption must be assessed against the applicable legal provisions and the actual reference published in the Official Journal, including its scope and restrictions. Annex ZA identifies the correspondence between standard clauses and legal requirements; it is not a standalone guarantee of compliance.

    No KROG rule run has evaluated these facts. See the EN 18286 standard page for sources.

    Documentation and access

    Specification documents are available on request from hello@signatu.com. Below: GCO Foundational Course — public introduction. Full course material is organised separately.